A statement made by a person in response to a requirement imposed on him under a disclosure order may not be used in evidence against him in criminal proceedings.
But subsection (1) does not apply—
in the case of proceedings under Part 3,
on a prosecution for an offence under section 393(1) or (3),
on a prosecution for perjury, or
on a prosecution for some other offence where, in giving evidence, the person makes a statement inconsistent with the statement mentioned in subsection (1).
A statement may not be used by virtue of subsection (2)(d) against a person unless—
evidence relating to it is adduced, or
a question relating to it is asked,
by him or on his behalf in the proceedings arising out of the prosecution.