Section 99: Postponement, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

The court may—

proceed under section 92 before it sentences the accused for the offence (or any of the offences concerned), or

postpone proceedings under section 92 for a specified period.

A period of postponement may be extended.

A period of postponement (including one as extended) must not end after the permitted period ends.

But subsection (3) does not apply if there are exceptional circumstances or if the accused has failed to comply with an order under section 102(1).

The permitted period is the period of two years starting with the date of conviction.

But if—

the accused appeals against his conviction for the offence (or any of the offences) concerned, and

the period of three months (starting with the day when the appeal is determined or otherwise disposed of) ends after the period found under subsection (5),

the permitted period is that period of three months.

A postponement or extension may be made—

on application by the accused;

on application by the prosecutor;

by the court of its own motion.

If—

proceedings are postponed for a period, and

an application to extend the period is made before it ends,

the application may be granted even after the period ends.

The date of conviction is—

the date on which the accused was convicted of the offence concerned, or

if there are two or more offences and the convictions were on different dates, the date of the latest.

A confiscation order must not be quashed only on the ground that there was a defect or omission in the procedure connected with the application for or the granting of a postponement.

But subsection (10) does not apply if before it made the confiscation order the court has—

imposed a fine on the accused;

made an order falling within section 97(3);

made an order under section 249 of the Procedure Act;

made a restitution order;

ordered the accused under section 253F(2) of the Procedure Act to pay a victim surcharge.

Section 99: Postponement

Discussed in

About this text