For the purposes of a determination for full representation in relation to a public law claim—
the criteria in regulations 41 to 44 (criteria for determinations for full representation) do not apply;
the Director must be satisfied that the criteria in regulation 53 (standard criteria for determinations for legal representation in relation to public law claims) are met; and
the criteria in paragraphs (2) and (3) apply.
An individual may qualify for full representation in relation to a public law claim only if the Director is satisfied that—
the individual has sent a letter before claim to the proposed defendant (except where this is impracticable), and where such a letter has been sent, the proposed defendant has been given a reasonable time to respond;
the proportionality test is met; and
the criterion in paragraph (3) is met.
The Director must be satisfied that the prospects of successfully obtaining the substantive order sought in the proceedings are—
very good, good or moderate; or
borderline or marginal, and—
the case is of significant wider public interest;
the case is one with overwhelming importance to the individual; or
the substance of the case relates to a breach of Convention rights.