Section 34: Effect of accused’s failure to mention facts when questioned or charged., Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

Where, in any proceedings against a person for an offence, evidence is given that the accused—

at any time before he was charged with the offence, on being questioned under caution by a constable trying to discover whether or by whom the offence had been committed, failed to mention any fact relied on in his defence in those proceedings; or

on being charged with the offence or officially informed that he might be prosecuted for it, failed to mention any such fact,; or

at any time after being charged with the offence, on being questioned under section 22 of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 (post-charge questioning), failed to mention any such fact,

being a fact which in the circumstances existing at the time the accused could reasonably have been expected to mention when so questioned, charged or informed, as the case may be, subsection (2) below applies.

Where this subsection applies—

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

a judge, in deciding whether to grant an application made by the accused under paragraph 2 of Schedule 3 to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998

the court, in determining whether there is a case to answer;

the court or jury, in determining whether the accused is guilty of the offence charged,

may draw such inferences from the failure as appear proper.

Where the accused was at an authorised place of detention at the time of the failure, subsections (1) and (2) above do not apply if he had not been allowed an opportunity to consult a solicitor prior to being questioned, charged or informed as mentioned in subsection (1) above.

Subject to any directions by the court, evidence tending to establish the failure may be given before or after evidence tending to establish the fact which the accused is alleged to have failed to mention.

This section applies in relation to questioning by persons (other than constables) charged with the duty of investigating offences or charging offenders as it applies in relation to questioning by constables; and in subsection (1) above “officially informed” means informed by a constable or any such person.

This section does not—

prejudice the admissibility in evidence of the silence or other reaction of the accused in the face of anything said in his presence relating to the conduct in respect of which he is charged, in so far as evidence thereof would be admissible apart from this section; or

preclude the drawing of any inference from any such silence or other reaction of the accused which could properly be drawn apart from this section.

This section does not apply in relation to a failure to mention a fact if the failure occurred before the commencement of this section.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Section 34: Effect of accused’s failure to mention facts when questioned or charged.

Discussed in

About this text