Section 45: Ex parte orders., Family Law Act 1996

The court may, in any case where it considers that it is just and convenient to do so, make an occupation order or a non-molestation order even though the respondent has not been given such notice of the proceedings as would otherwise be required by rules of court.

In determining whether to exercise its powers under subsection (1), the court shall have regard to all the circumstances including—

any risk of significant harm to the applicant or a relevant child, attributable to conduct of the respondent, if the order is not made immediately;

whether it is likely that the applicant will be deterred or prevented from pursuing the application if an order is not made immediately; and

whether there is reason to believe that the respondent is aware of the proceedings but is deliberately evading service and that the applicant or a relevant child will be seriously prejudiced by the delay involved in effecting substituted service.

If the court makes an order by virtue of subsection (1) it must afford the respondent an opportunity to make representations relating to the order as soon as just and convenient at a full hearing.

If, at a full hearing, the court makes an occupation order ( "the full order"), then—

for the purposes of calculating the maximum period for which the full order may be made to have effect, the relevant section is to apply as if the period for which the full order will have effect began on the date on which the initial order first had effect; and

the provisions of section 36(10) or 38(6) as to the extension of orders are to apply as if the full order and the initial order were a single order.

In this section—

"full hearing" means a hearing of which notice has been given to all the parties in accordance with rules of court;
"initial order" means an occupation order made by virtue of subsection (1); and
"relevant section" means section 33(10), 35(10), 36(10), 37(5) or 38(6).

Section 45: Ex parte orders.

Discussed in

About this text