A court may vary or discharge a domestic abuse protection order under this section—
The persons referred to in subsection (2)(a) are—
Before deciding whether to vary or discharge an order under this section, the court must hear from—
For the purposes of subsection (4)(a) each of the following is a “relevant chief officer of police”—
Section 33 (matters to be considered before making an order) applies in relation to the variation or discharge of a domestic abuse protection order as it applies in relation to the making of such an order, but as if references to the person for whose protection the order would be made were references to the person for whose protection the order was made.
Section 34 (making of orders without notice) applies in relation to the variation of a domestic abuse protection order as it applies in relation to the making of such an order, but as if—
The court may include an additional requirement in the order, or extend the period for which the order, or a requirement imposed by the order, has effect, only if it is satisfied that it is necessary to do so in order to protect the person for whose protection the order was made from domestic abuse, or the risk of domestic abuse, carried out by P.
The court may not extend the period for which an electronic monitoring requirement has effect by more than 12 months at a time.
The court may remove any requirement imposed by the order, or make such a requirement less onerous, only if satisfied that the requirement as imposed is no longer necessary to protect the person for whose protection the order was made from domestic abuse, or the risk of domestic abuse, carried out by P.
If it appears to the court that any conditions necessary for a requirement to be imposed are no longer met, the court—
The court may discharge the order only if satisfied that the order is no longer necessary to protect the person for whose protection it was made from domestic abuse, or the risk of domestic abuse, carried out by P.