The following provisions apply where, immediately after a decision of the Court of Appeal from which an appeal lies to the Supreme Court, the prosecutor is granted or gives notice that he intends to apply for, leave to appeal.
If, but for the decision of the Court of Appeal, the defendant would be liable to be detained, the Court of Appeal shall make—
The Court may make an order under subsection (2)(b) only if they think that it is in the interests of justice that the defendant should not be liable to be detained as a result of the decision of the Supreme Court on the appeal.
An order under subsection (2)(a) shall (unless the appeal has previously been disposed of) cease to have effect at the expiration of the period for which the defendant would have been liable to be detained but for the decision of the Court of Appeal.
Where an order is made under subsection (2)(a) in the case of a defendant who, but for the decision of the Court of Appeal, would be liable to be detained in pursuance of—
the order under subsection (2)(a) shall be one authorising his continued detention in pursuance of the order or direction referred to in paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection; and the provisions of the Mental Health Act 1983 with respect to persons liable to be detained as mentioned in this subsection (including provisions as to the renewal of authority for detention and the removal or discharge of patients) shall apply accordingly.
Where an order is made under subsection (2)(a) in the case of a defendant who, but for the decision of the Court of Appeal, would be liable to be detained in pursuance of a remand under section 36 of the Mental Health Act 1983 or an interim hospital order under section 38 of that Act, the order may, if the Court of Appeal thinks fit, be one authorising his continued detention in a hospital or mental nursing home and in that event—
The defendant shall not be liable to be detained again as a result of the decision of the Supreme Court on the appeal if—